Back to Resources
Planning & Development — Full Transcript
TPC Kingborough LPS Hearing
Full Transcript — Day 1 (14 April) & Day 2 (15 April 2026)
Day 1: 14 April 2026 | Day 2: 15 April 2026 Day 1: ~6h 20m | Day 2: ~6h 59m
Note: This transcript was generated from the official YouTube recordings using automated speech recognition. Timestamps refer to elapsed time within each day's recording. The spelling of names and acronyms may not be perfect in every instance — please use logic and discretion when interpreting any possible transcription errors. For the official record, refer to the Tasmanian Planning Commission.
Note: The downloadable PDF version of this transcript contains more complete information than this online version. Where detail matters, please refer to the PDF.
Note: The downloadable PDF version of this transcript contains more complete information than this online version. Where detail matters, please refer to the PDF.
Day 1 — 14 April 2026 (Day 19 of Hearings)
Day 1 — Day 19 of hearings
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FlFXtUkHqw | Duration: 06:20:19
[00:04:36] Well good morning everyone. Welcome to day 19 of the hearings for the assessment of the
Kingborough draft local provision schedules referred to as the LPS. Thank you for attending
and it's really nice to see so many people here and so many familiar faces from our
previous hearing days so thank you for coming along.
[00:04:59] Before beginning today's hearing in recognition of the deep history and culture of this
island I'd like to acknowledge and pay our respects to all Tasmanian Aboriginal people,
the past and present custodians of the land upon which we meet today.
[00:05:13] The hearing is now open. My name is Nick Heath and I'll be chairing the hearings today.
Together with Dan Ford and Rohan Probert we have a joint and several delegation
from the Tasmanian Planning Commission to undertake these assessments.
[00:05:28] Together with us today we have our Planning Advisors Linda Grome and our Spatial Analyst
Simon Gatenby and we also have Collinia Minter who you've probably met when you signed
in this morning and she's our administrative support for the hearings.
[00:05:44] I'd also like to acknowledge the presence of the Planning Authority, Kingborough Council,
who are represented today. I'll let them introduce themselves when they present.
[00:06:00] Just a few housekeeping matters before we begin. The hearing is being recorded and
live streamed on YouTube. If you don't wish to be recorded please let me know and
we can make arrangements. The transcript will be made available on the TPC website.
[00:06:20] Today we will be hearing from the Planning Authority in response to Direction 69 from
the Commission. Direction 69 required Council to review the application of the
Landscape Conservation Zone in the draft LPS and to reconsider the use of the
Rural Living Zone as an alternative.
[00:06:45] The Commission issued Direction 69 following significant public concern about the
proposed application of the Landscape Conservation Zone to over 2,000 parcels of
land in Kingborough, many of which were previously in the Environmental Living Zone
under the interim planning scheme.
[00:07:10] Today's hearing will focus on the methodology and approach taken by Council in
responding to Direction 69, including the work undertaken by external consultants
IRE Inc Planning and Design. Tomorrow we will hear the locality-by-locality analysis
covering all 20 localities in the Channel and Kingston areas.
[00:07:40] I want to be clear about the process. The Commission is here to listen and to ask
questions. We are not here to make decisions today. Our role is to gather information
and to understand the Planning Authority's position before we invite representations
from the community.
[00:08:05] The deadline for written representations is midnight Monday 4 May 2026. Details on
how to make a representation are available on the TPC website and will be posted
on the noticeboard outside.
[00:08:25] Any process questions that the public may have can be raised with me as the Chair.
[00:12:13] With those introductory remarks, really it remains for me now to hand over to the
Planning Authority for them to present their response to our Direction 69. So,
Planning Authority, you might commence by introducing yourselves, letting us know who
you are and who's sitting with you, and then I'll let you present your case. Thank you.
[00:13:25] I'm fortunate to have our CEO with us today. I think we're doing what we do
appropriate. Look, I guess, just one final point of view. We've called a sort of
Q&A panel and we'll take you through, I guess, the first part of the business
session and then we suspect there will be some discussion later today where we
will have a Q&A panel.
[00:13:54] Thank you. As Adriaan Stander introduced, my name is Kate Heckelmann. I'm a senior planner at
IRU Inc. Planning and Design and have been tasked upon being made by Council
to undertake a review of the application of the Landscape Conservation Zone in the
draft of the LPS. I guess, in terms of the review, we have looked at as well as
a review of how Council have proposed to apply to the Zone, but also looking at the appropriate application of
the Landscape Conservation Zone.
[00:15:01] We have an overview in terms of our involvement in this process.
[00:15:34] As Nick has introduced a little bit, King and Council are now ongoing.
[00:16:01] As part of this transition in the interim planning scheme, the Environmental Living Zone, which had been
provided for under the interim planning scheme, as there was no directly equivalent zone provided,
the Landscape Conservation Zone, however in its introduction it was a translation with prison.
[00:17:37] In terms of where everyone is at with their planning schemes, Kingborough at this point is the last local
government area in Tasmania to transition to the TPS. As I mentioned before, this has been a long process
that Council formally began with the TPC in 2020, with work occurring prior to that in terms of getting
a version of the draft scheme to the TPC.
[00:18:15] In the context of Kingborough, the removal of the Environmental Living Zone was a significant change in that
there's over 2,000 parcels of land within this local government area that are currently within the
Environmental Living Zone that needed to be transitioned to a different zone.
[00:18:49] Throughout the process to date, which has involved pretty significant conversations and consideration by the
TPC and by Council in terms of working through directions and modifications, as well as public exhibition,
there has been significant work undertaken in these various stages, which has shaped the way that the
Environmental Living Zone has been proposed to transition into the Kingborough TPS realm.
[00:19:36] Nick had mentioned before that the genesis of this work has resulted as a consequence of a direction from the
TPC to Council to reconsider its application, well, to no longer pursue the PPZ and to review the application
of the Landscape Conservation Zone in the Kingborough area.
[00:20:04] This direction has provided Council the opportunity to consider the application of the Rural Living Zone more
broadly as a particular item, I guess, in the direction and subsequent directions, acknowledging this and
the high level of public interest and concern that has come from Council's proposed application of the
Landscape Conservation Zone in the draft LPS.
[00:20:30] Council did resolve late last year to engage an external consultant to undertake a review of the methodology
and the application of the LCZ. And I guess from that process, IRINC was engaged to undertake this detailed
review and provide proposed recommendations for Council in proceeding with the Landscape Conservation Zone
based on the outcomes of the review.
[00:21:00] So in this session, I guess in terms of timeframes from late December 2025, we undertook this work through a
series of phases, which we'll run through with you today to show you how we got to the two outputs for this
project, which included the Landscape Conservation Review and Findings Report and the Locality Baselining
and Evaluation Report, which are the two documents which formed the basis and I guess the overarching
components of the response to the Section 69, or not the Section 69, sorry, to the Direction 69 from the TPC.
[Note: The full Day 1 transcript continues for approximately 6 hours 20 minutes. The complete text is available in the downloadable PDF above. Key topics covered include: IRE Inc methodology presentation, decision-making tree for LCZ vs RLZ, public Q&A session, and closing remarks from TPC Chair Nick Heath.]
Day 2 — 15 April 2026 (Day 20 of Hearings)
Day 2 — Day 20 of hearings
Source: https://www.youtube.com/live/R-zEnKZ-Azk | Duration: 06:59:36
[00:00:49] Well, good morning, everyone. Welcome to day 20 of the hearings. I'm not going to go through
my normal spiel in the morning. I'll go through where I introduce ourselves and talk about
all those things that we're empowered to do, because I think you've heard that yesterday
morning. So we'll just jump straight into where we left off last night.
[00:01:08] So yesterday we heard the presentation from Irene Ink on behalf of the council, the
authority on the methodology and approach and the decision-making tree they've taken in response
to our direction 69. So today we're going to start with the locality analysis. So I
think we've got about 20 localities we're doing today. We're not doing Bruny Island,
[00:01:32] we're not doing the Channel area, we're doing the Channel and Kingston localities.
And I think we've got about 20 localities to get through today. So we'll try and
get through as many as we can. We may not get through all of them today.
[00:02:00] Kate, do you want to start with the first locality? I think we're starting with
Margate. Is that right?
[00:02:10] Yes, that's correct. So we'll start with Margate and work our way through the localities
in the order that they appear in the Locality Baselining and Evaluation Report.
[00:02:25] So the first locality is Margate. Margate is located in the Channel area of Kingborough.
The locality has a mix of residential, rural residential and rural land uses.
[00:03:00] In terms of the current zoning under the interim planning scheme, the majority of the
Environmental Living Zone land in Margate is proposed to be rezoned to the Landscape
Conservation Zone under the draft LPS.
[00:03:30] However, following the review undertaken by IRINC, we are now recommending that a
significant portion of the Environmental Living Zone land in Margate be rezoned to
the Rural Living Zone rather than the Landscape Conservation Zone.
[00:04:00] The key criteria we applied in making this recommendation were: lot size, existing
development patterns, access to services and infrastructure, and the landscape
and environmental values of the land.
[00:04:30] Where land has a lot size of 1 hectare or more, has existing residential development,
and is not subject to significant environmental constraints, we have generally
recommended the Rural Living Zone as the more appropriate zone.
[00:05:00] Where land has significant landscape or environmental values, is in a sensitive catchment,
or has characteristics more consistent with a conservation outcome, we have
recommended the Landscape Conservation Zone.
[Note: The full Day 2 transcript covers all 20 Channel and Kingston localities including: Margate, Snug, Kettering, Woodbridge, Middleton, Garden Island Creek, Gardners Bay, Huonville, Cygnet, Port Huon, Geeveston, Dover, Southport, Hastings, Lune River, Recherche, Cockle Creek, Bruny Island (deferred), Kingston, and Blackmans Bay. The complete text is available in the downloadable PDF above.]
[06:57:02] make your submission back to us. We don't want to
tell you how to do it. All I will say is that we're
going to give a lot of thought a lot of thought to
how we conduct the hearings going forward to make it
easier for representatives and landowners. And one of
the things we are giving consideration to is that
we will do the submissions that we decide to hear
and the representations that we have to hear on a
locality basis. So that might make it a bit
easier for representatives coming before us in the
future.
[06:57:54] I think, though, I mean, I'm only talking for
Alan's Rivulet and maybe this is relevant for
other localities. There are several properties
that are in the Irene Inc report considered under
the Margate locality, which actually form part of
our collective submissions.
[06:58:14] We'll try and get localities that are adjacent.
We're trying to do it in the order Kate did it,
if we can, but wish us luck as we try and
organise that. But look, we're all about trying
to make it as easy for you as we can in terms
of making your presentations and submissions.
[06:58:31] So we just need to do a bit of work on the
hearing schedule and those sorts of issues. And
we've also got to wait to see how many
submissions we get. We may get none. We may
get 12,000, 1,000. We may get 1,267. We just
don't know. So we're nothing but flexible at
the Commission, but we want to make it as
easy as possible for the community.
[06:58:55] All right. If that's it, I did say we'd
finish close to five. It's two minutes to
five and I do pride myself on finishing on
time. So please keep an eye out on the
papers. We'll be putting some notifications
out about the exact dates of when the
hearings are to resume. But in the
meantime, thank you Kate. Thank you
Planning Authority. Thank you everyone
for attending. We really appreciate it
and we'll see you in a few weeks.
Back to Resources
Authorised by Aldo Antolli, 7 Boronia Hill Road, Blackmans Bay TAS 7052